Comments on: Late Night Thoughts on Christmas Reading https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/ Your Source for Everything Pop Culture Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:31:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1295 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:45:46 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1295 In reply to M. Lapham.

You know what would be really far out? Taking this fakakt picture down.

]]>
By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1294 Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:54:31 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1294 In reply to Mr. Murray.

What the Hell, are you talking about?

Oh yes, one more thing, TAKE THIS PHOTO DOWN SCOTT.

]]>
By: Mr. Murray https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1293 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:05:42 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1293 AHA! I knew you had a friend named Bojangles, Scratch! The jig is up Lapham. THE.. JIG… IS…UP!*
(* Dramatic repeating of lines is trademarked by Brian Michael Bendis)

]]>
By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1292 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:32:17 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1292 In reply to Mr. Murray.

That doesn’t change the fact that I don’t like having my image plastered across the internet. Maybe the rest of the world has given up on privacy, but I haven’t Besides, the world needs to be protected from that ugly mug.

]]>
By: Mr. Murray https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1291 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:46:30 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1291 Scratch, get over yourself. Only a handful of people have even read this article and they all know what you look like.

]]>
By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1290 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:31:52 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1290 In reply to M. Lapham.

Take it down. Please.

]]>
By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1289 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:31:17 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1289 In reply to M. Lapham.

Still want that photo down.

]]>
By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1288 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:35:34 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1288 In reply to M. Lapham.

I want that photo down.

]]>
By: M. Lapham https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1287 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:33:47 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1287 In reply to C. Scott Lovejoy.

Seriously, I want that photo down.

]]>
By: Dan Harrington https://gobacktothepast.com/marvel-two-in-one-and-christmas/#comment-1286 Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:23:03 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=14433#comment-1286 In reply to C. Scott Lovejoy.

First, yes, clearly posting this in December makes since. What I meant was attacking Christians at this time is what seems off. Of all times to insult us now seems an odd choice, and yet an all to common one.

Second, yes perhaps I was a bit… over zealous in my response, but I stand with the sentiment. The constant flow of non-Christians telling me the true reason for the season irritates me to no end. I find it to be very condescending. As if I, and people like me do not truly understand the meaning of the season. And as I said, yes I did go a bit overboard with my response. That is not the tone that I want identified by certainly not my faith. So for that I apologize.

Now that I have finished that, I will say this, I do think this is garbage. And I do think that why not malicious, it did come from a negative place. I think it is a typical view by people not of my faith that we do not understand out own religion, that while we may follow a belief system that they may agree with, we of that faith have lost our way and do not live up to it. It is a type of arrogance that fills the media.

Once again, I am sorry for the way I responded, but not for the idea behind it. And I am sure the author of this piece is a fine person and meant no ill will, but that does not mean that none could be taken.

]]>