Comments on: RETRO REVIEW: Camelot 3000 # 1

By: Greg Turner

Greg Turner — Thu, 06 Apr 2017 18:40:53 +0000

In reply to Beast Brony. Hey, thanks for the correction, good sir! The series is definitely worth reading, no matter when you get around to reading or even re-reading it. Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment!

By: Beast Brony

Beast Brony — Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:01:01 +0000

It was Percival, not Gawain who was the Neo-Man, I literally just read the comic April/3/2017, today is April/4/2017

By: greg

greg — Sat, 07 May 2011 16:44:32 +0000

In reply to greg. That's not to say that I didn't put any work into the review, as I did, but I thought I better expound on the previous comment, as it read like maybe I didn't really put any effort into this week's RETRO REVIEW! Nuff said.

By: greg

greg — Sat, 07 May 2011 02:35:36 +0000

And it wasn’t easy! I think I worked harder and longer on the d**n slider pic than I did on the actual review!

By: C. Scott Lovejoy

C. Scott Lovejoy — Fri, 06 May 2011 21:07:48 +0000

Slider bar win for Greg!

By: Dave Marchand

Dave Marchand — Fri, 06 May 2011 12:30:47 +0000

Tis true, this doth be a grand series, even if the main hero doth not wield a hammer.