Comments on: RETRO REVIEW: Dazzler # 1 https://gobacktothepast.com/retro-review-dazzler-1/ Your Source for Everything Pop Culture Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:04:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 By: greg https://gobacktothepast.com/retro-review-dazzler-1/#comment-412 Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:35:25 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=2889#comment-412 In reply to greg.

ould … would … whatever! I guess I can’t type while visualizing what you’d be doing!

]]> By: greg https://gobacktothepast.com/retro-review-dazzler-1/#comment-411 Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:33:54 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=2889#comment-411 In reply to C. Scott Lovejoy.

I ould like to see that, Scott! ;-0

]]> By: C. Scott Lovejoy https://gobacktothepast.com/retro-review-dazzler-1/#comment-410 Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:50:56 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=2889#comment-410 Fighting as long as the radio is playing is a mutant power?

Dude, you should see me while “Kung Fu Fighting” is on!

]]> By: Jim Johnson https://gobacktothepast.com/retro-review-dazzler-1/#comment-409 Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:34:10 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=2889#comment-409 Funny how publishers thought for so long that they could get girls interested in comics by putting a female in the lead and then tell the exact same story they would have if it were starring a guy.

And if Marvel really WAS going after female readership, then this book was kind of an odd choice of being Marvel’s first comic sold only in the direct market; a market consisting of largely male consumers.

This comic and series was wretched. I can’t believe I hung on even longer than you did . . .

]]>