Comments on: I WILL TELL YOU #33: Toeing the Line https://gobacktothepast.com/toeing-the-line-can-dc-keep-holding-the-line/ Your Source for Everything Pop Culture Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:55:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.4 By: Jim Johnson https://gobacktothepast.com/toeing-the-line-can-dc-keep-holding-the-line/#comment-450 Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:45:17 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=3126#comment-450 In reply to Tom O’Connor.

It’s not an off-chance; it’s a relative certainty with the only unknown being how long it will take. History has proven it. Sure, I’ll enjoy it while it lasts, however long that is, but I can just hear future fandom’s teeth gnashing now when those comics break the $3 barrier again.

At Comic-Con, DC admitted that the Drawing the Line campaign failed; it yielded temporary sales increases that immediately began dwindling again. But, simply raising the prices back to their old level would have been disastrous, so they realized they had to try something else, a something else that became the upcoming relaunch. I don’t know why they didn’t think of simply trying to make their comics better in the first place; readers just might have been willing to pay $3.99 for a Geoff Johns / Jim Lee Justice League comic.

When the prices start going up again, and they will, at least we (hopefully) will be getting a better product than what we were when the prices dropped.

]]>
By: Tom O'Connor https://gobacktothepast.com/toeing-the-line-can-dc-keep-holding-the-line/#comment-449 Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:46:22 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=3126#comment-449 So we should just suck it up and pay four bucks a book now because there’s the off chance that at some undetermined time in the future books will be $4 anyway at only 20 pages?

That seems rather defeatish to me, and I’m not so sure I agree.

I applaud DC for trying something. Yeah, it may not be to everybody’s tastes, but neither is a $4 comic. I’m hoping that their new initiative and price point makes a difference and turns the tide, but I’m also a realist. That doesn’t mean that I’m going to shoot myself in the foot and support $4 comics at the same time, however. Marvel has not gotten a dime of my money since they forged ahead with $4 books. Their loss has been DC’s, and Image’s, and Dark Horse’s, and IDW’s gain.

]]>
By: Dave Marchand https://gobacktothepast.com/toeing-the-line-can-dc-keep-holding-the-line/#comment-448 Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:35:35 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=3126#comment-448 Sadly, most of the people buying comics…are the one’s buying them now, thus comics ARE the only home of advertisement ON comics.

And, the slow loss of pages….makes waiting past a month for issues even more embarassing.

]]>
By: Jim Johnson https://gobacktothepast.com/toeing-the-line-can-dc-keep-holding-the-line/#comment-447 Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:45:28 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=3126#comment-447 A large part of the increase is also due to better creator compensation and higher production values. But to go back on either of these is undesirable; the return to a literal four-color palette, for example, would only be another form of cheapening the product, and I don’t think anyone wants to see any of the gains made by creators over the years curtailed.

Regarding advertising, some have suggested over the years actually ADDING 8 or 16 pages, all ads, to a standard comic book, to hold the price down and preserve the story page count. This is actually closer to the business model for many periodical magazines, but I wonder with so many publications having difficulty filling advertising space nowadays, this would probably no longer work.

Maybe that’s why comics feature so many inhouse ads, come to think of it.

]]>
By: Peter Bickford https://gobacktothepast.com/toeing-the-line-can-dc-keep-holding-the-line/#comment-446 Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:20:36 +0000 https://gobacktothepast.com/?p=3126#comment-446 Back in the late 1990s, I wrote an article called the “76 cent solution” which argued that the cost of a $0.20 comic from 1972 should only cost about 76 cents at the time of the article’s writing if it had merely kept up with overall inflation. Today, that same comic would clock in at $1.03, taking inflation into account.

So why are we arguing about whether it’s possible or advisable to keep the line at four times that price? One big clue comes from looking at the ad pages inside a 1972 comic and comparing them against a current Marvel one. The 1972 comic is almost entirely populated by paid (and generally smaller) ads, whereas most current Marvel and DC comics feature only full page ads with “house ads” taking up a great deal of the salable space. In short, the $4 comic of today needs to be supported by its actual street price, whereas the $0.20 comic of 1972 was largely supported by its advertisers.

]]>